The Castles

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Grey J

Grey J

Active member
VFTT Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
683
Reaction score
66
Location
Chattanooga TN
I did the Castle trail many years ago but recently had a good look at it from the Caps Ridge Trail. Reading up on that route the other day, I have found that the elevations for The Castles vary according to your source. Peakbagger.com lists the NW Castle, aka The First Castle, at 4330 while the AMC WMG lists it as 4450. That's quite a difference, 120 feet.

Peakbagger.com lists the higher SE Castle as 4500. The AMC WMG does not give an elevation for the SE Castle but says that it's "slightly higher" which would be more consistent with an elevation of 4450 for the NW Castle. If anyone can clarify this for me, I'd appreciate it. Finally, is this a photo of The First (NW) Castle? Or is this both Castles?
10.jpg
 
The WMG 30th edition lists the first castle at 4450, then a slightly higher castle, then higher but lesser crags.
Your picture, plus mine from a similar viewpoint showing a higher crag, indicate that both castles' elevations are similar. I imagine the difference is less than 50' but that's just a guess. The 4330 figure seems most suspect.
1707021258CastlesShade.jpg
 
Last edited:
The best reference for elevations in the whites bar none is Brad Washburn's map published in 1988. It was done while he was working on his map of Everest. Worth getting a copy if you don't have one.

The map has two points which I expect are the Castles, the northernmost elevation is 4458 with one just south east is 4456. I expect those are the two in the photo.

Brad's team installed extensive control points all over the whites and his white temporary benchmarks nailed to trees were located all over at spots along the trail where views to the primary control points could be obtained. The primary control points are 8" stainless steel pins set in drilled holes in rock usually at prominent points and frequently the holes were drilled with an electric impact drill powered by a portable generator that were hand carried to the site. Although they used photogrametry for the contours, all the trails were surveyed with surveying equipment to establish the control points.
 
Last edited:
peakbagger said:
Brad's team installed extensive control points all over the whites and his white temporary benchmarks nailed to trees were located all over at spots along the trail where views to the primary control points could be obtained. The primary control points are 8" stainless steel pins set in drilled holes in rock usually at prominent points and frequently the holes were drilled with an electric impact drill powered by a portable generator that were hand carried to the site. Although they used photogrametry for the contours, all the trails were surveyed with surveying equipment to establish the control points.
Click to expand...

I have that map mounted at my place in Lincoln. Not here where I could reference it in my earlier post. Thanks for the additional background info.
 
peakbagger said:
The best reference for elevations in the whites bar none is Brad Washburn's map published in 1988. It was done while he was working on his map of Everest. Worth getting a copy if you don't have one.

The map has two points which I expect are the Castles, the northernmost elevation is 4458 with one just south east is 4456. I expect those are the two in the photo.

Brad's team installed extensive control points all over the whites and his white temporary benchmarks nailed to trees were located all over at spots along the trail where views to the primary control points could be obtained. The primary control points are 8" stainless steel pins set in drilled holes in rock usually at prominent points and frequently the holes were drilled with an electric impact drill powered by a portable generator that were hand carried to the site. Although they used photogrametry for the contours, all the trails were surveyed with surveying equipment to establish the control points.
Click to expand...

Wish I had that map but it appears to be out of print. I have noticed the stainless steel pins on summits. If those are indeed the 2 Castles in my photo (and RichS's) then they do seem about the same height, at least from that perspective. I just wasn't sure if that was one Castle or both Castles and yes, I agree RichS that the 4330 figure is the outlier. It is interesting peakbagger, that you say the Washburn map has the NW or First Castle (ascending) as 2 feet higher while the AMC WMG has the SE Castle as "slightly higher." Its not really important just interesting.
 
If you want a copy they generally pop up with a web search. There were three variants, plain paper unfolded, paper folded and Tyvek. Washburn autographed quite a few copies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Hiking two trails with a bad rep (that they may not deserve).
Replies
15
Views
2K
Sherby
Sherby
P
In Defense of the Cornice Trail on Mt Jefferson
Replies
0
Views
1K
peakbagger
P
Ear Drum
Pemi Loop 3-night backpack, Aug 21-24 2023
Replies
15
Views
2K
JoshandBaron
J
arm
Maine: Baxter backpack and hiking Cutler Bold Coast
Replies
6
Views
2K
Rhody Seth
Rhody Seth
Oncoman
Obtaining on line various lists for peaks beyond New England 3,000 footers (Oncoman)
Replies
0
Views
6K
Oncoman
Oncoman

Latest posts

Top