Papa Bear
New member
I just heard that Topozone has been sold to Trails.com and use of the map server will no longer be free.
I would guess that Trails.com will be disappointed if they think they will make money on what was always free. With all the map services out there (MSN, Yahoo, Google, etc) which are driven by advertising, charging for content is becoming a thing of the past. Their business model needs to move forward, not backward. And remember, the USGS maps, although we all love them, are almost all obsolete as for what's on the ground.
My problem will be fixing the hundreds of embedded Topozone links in my reports.
I use Google more and more and I have a version that uses the USGS map tiles so going forward I won't suffer from this. Besides the new "Terrain" map type is pretty good for most purposes.
My opinion: don't join Trails.com - you'll do better learning to use one of the free map services.
Disclaimer: I do not work for or own any stock in Trails.com or any free map service.
I would guess that Trails.com will be disappointed if they think they will make money on what was always free. With all the map services out there (MSN, Yahoo, Google, etc) which are driven by advertising, charging for content is becoming a thing of the past. Their business model needs to move forward, not backward. And remember, the USGS maps, although we all love them, are almost all obsolete as for what's on the ground.
My problem will be fixing the hundreds of embedded Topozone links in my reports.
I use Google more and more and I have a version that uses the USGS map tiles so going forward I won't suffer from this. Besides the new "Terrain" map type is pretty good for most purposes.
My opinion: don't join Trails.com - you'll do better learning to use one of the free map services.
Disclaimer: I do not work for or own any stock in Trails.com or any free map service.