Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Proposed bushwhacking classification.

  1. #1
    Senior Member Neil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,439

    Proposed bushwhacking classification.

    Bushwhacking Classification System
    There's a certain amount of interest in bushwhacking on the forums. In order to facilitate communication amongst the 'shwacker community here's a proposed classification of increasing levels of bushwhacking difficulty. Let me know what you think.

    Classes of Bushwhacking

    Class 1
    No real path. Old trails fallen into disuse fit this category. Forest is open, walking is easy with few to no obstacles. There may be any or all of the following features: Distinctive geographical features visible or audible (creek) aid in navigation. Old blazes and/cuttings may be present. Map and compass unnecessary.

    Class 2
    There is no old trail or man-made features. There are occasional detours around obstacles such as blowdown and hands are occasionally used to push branches away from one’s face but most of the going is easy. Map and compass are consulted occasionally. There may or may not be a distinctive geographical feature visible or audible (creek) to aid in navigation.

    Class 3
    Views are limited to approx. 10 feet. Detours around, over or under obstacles are frequent. Pauses in order to decide the best route are frequent. Hands are almost constantly in use to push branches away. Care must be taken in placing one’s feet to avoid holes. Compass is in constant use.

    Class 4
    Very difficult. Members of party must stay close together in order to maintain visual contact. Forward progress is impeded by brush that must be pushed aside in order to advance. Every step is taken with caution as one’s own feet are obscured by foliage. Long sleeves and pants essential to avoid cuts. Compass in constant use. GPS very helpful.

    Class 5
    *!?&$_)$&*É
    Steep uphill through dense cripplebush that requires intense, heroic efforts to advance as much as one foot. Cothes are torn, eyes are gouged, blood may flow, some unstable marriages may not remain intact. Members of party experience episodes of fantasizing about sunny beaches, luxury hotel rooms, 5 star restaurants and the like. Phrases such as, ‘never again’ and ‘whose idea was this?’ frequently heard.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Nadine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    West Enfield, ME Avatar: Mt. Katahdin, Tablelands, 2/05
    Posts
    590
    Hmmmm, so Elephant from the AT would be a Class 5

  3. #3
    Senior Member RoySwkr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,481
    Originally posted by Nadine
    Hmmmm, so Elephant from the AT would be a Class 5
    Closer to 3 as I remember it :-)

    That is one of the problems with any system, terrain can be vastly different 50 feet away

    Now what would you call a logging road overgrown in briars, which if Nadine tries in shorts in July would rate a @3$%*& but if she tries on skis in January is a wide clear path?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Neil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,439
    Hmmmm. Good point. What if we use the convention that the ratings pertain only to the summer time?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Wild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    East Rochester, New York
    Posts
    206

    Creeks

    Distinctive geographical features visible or audible (creek) aid in navigation.
    I'm guessing that you have done most of your creek hiking in the High Peaks. I had, too, and was most unpleasantly surprised when I went bushwhacking in the Five Ponds Wilderness this last August. We expected nice rock beds to follow, perhaps a few cataracts to scramble up, so we planned our route along numerous creeks and pond outlets. Much to our chagrin, the majority of creeks in that part of the Adirondacks are labyrinths of wildly meandering channels that flow through low, skeeter-ridden marshes. We spent an awful lot of time wading through water up to our waists, hoping the leaches spared us long enough to reach the next brushy spit of mud. It was nearly as difficult as some of the cripple-brush thrashes I've done in the high peaks.

    It's a good classification system, but I'm not sure if I would want to know how difficult a bushwhack was going to be. Not knowing is part of the adventure. I've gotten myself into some nasty situations because of this stubbornness, but getting myself out - planning an alternate route by headlamp, taking a compass bearing and striking out across a blank spot on the map, stumbling on nice little spots in the middle of nowhere - these things are what makes it exciting, and keeps me coming back for more.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Avatar: Mt Washington
    Posts
    1,694
    Scar Ridge is a definately a class 5!

  7. #7
    Senior Member Neil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,439
    Wild, you're right about my classification being a dry land system only. I have been in a creekwhacking situation with a canoe that we hauled and lugged through shallow waters, over logjams, under willow canopies and so on. What made it so bad was it was the last day of a 17 day trip and were hoping to come out at a lake where our friend's cottage was and join the party. We never made it.

  8. #8
    Senior Member spencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Maine Avatar: We could use some snow around here
    Posts
    1,488
    Originally posted by rbhayes
    Scar Ridge is a definately a class 5!
    As Roy pointed out, one of the flaws of a system like this (not specifically yours Neil, just in general) is that conditions and experiences can vary so much.

    When I did Scar with some others, we had a pretty easy time of it, but I know that's not always the case. I've done White Cap via a really easy route, and via a really nasty route. All depends on approach, time of year, party, and of course, luck!

    I like the system in theory, but I'm not sure how effective it would be.

    spencer

  9. #9
    Tramper Al
    Guest

    Ours go to 11

    Originally posted by spencer
    When I did Scar with some others, we had a pretty easy time of it, but I know that's not always the case.
    I agree. If our Scar Ridge were to be rated a 5, then we would need a scale that goes to 11.

    So much luck involved.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Nadine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    West Enfield, ME Avatar: Mt. Katahdin, Tablelands, 2/05
    Posts
    590
    All valid points.

    While I had a dog of a time doing Elephant, I had a pretty easy time of Scar Ridge. Sometimes 50 yards makes all the difference.


    And in the winter, even East Turner might be a pleasant hike... (highly unlikely though).

  11. #11
    Senior Member masshysteria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, Mass.- Mahanna Cobble
    Posts
    315
    Neil, lets put a for-instance to this system.

    What would you rate the wack from Iriquois to Shepards Tooth as?

    How about some other famous bushwacks?

    Perhaps Tim and Brian will offer their opinions on this, but my freshest wack memories of the Basin Amp assault was that the push from the trail to the Amp was a class 4. While the stroll out was a 4.5. I can't honestly give the outbound a 5, because it doesn't fit the criteria of being an uphill climb. Plus the phrases we were muttering were along the lines of;"whose f....ng idea was this!?" Not in exact keeping with the proposed system.

    I think with a little fine tuning Neil, this may become as big as the Richter Scale or Moh's Scale.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Neil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,439
    Originally posted by masshysteria

    I think with a little fine tuning Neil, this may become as big as the Richter Scale or Moh's Scale.
    What's the name of that operating system that is fine tuned by the users? Linux?
    Feel free to edit the original. I also forgot to take into consideration the presence or abscence of blood sucking insects. Imagine a class 5 with hordes of black flies in your nostrils.

    As for the Tooth (ie. Catamount Peak) I would put the thickest parts at class 4. From the tooth to the Iroquois - Marshall col : class 3.

    The top of Wright Slide and the top of the wrong (left) East Dix slide?: Class 5 all the way.

    John's Brook to the base of Bennie's brook Slide on LWJ?: A classic Class 1.

    Adk LOj to Marcy Dam?: Class -1000

  13. #13
    Senior Member Wild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    East Rochester, New York
    Posts
    206
    The ridge from the top of the Ermine Brook Slide to the summit of Santanoni was a five when I did it five or so years ago. As someone else on this site eloquently put it, it was like trying to squeeze through snow fence. Not only did I mutter all of the four letter words in the English language, I actually had my partner, who I had just met, fearing for his life.

  14. #14
    Senior Member WalksWithBlackflies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Syracuse, NY; Avatar: The Snake
    Posts
    525
    Shepard's Tooth from Iroquois: Class 5 when I did it from the south(east) side, north(west) side seemed easier. I agree that the whack from the Tooth to col is Class 3.

    Sod holes should be added to the classification system. The whack of Hough/Pough col to Bouquet River Basin at base of E. Dix slide varies from Class 1 to Class 4, but knee to waist-deep sod holes in some areas had me checking every footstep.
    --- The hiker formerly known as Rico

  15. #15
    Senior Member WalksWithBlackflies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Syracuse, NY; Avatar: The Snake
    Posts
    525
    Forgot to mention:

    I just did some whackin in Colorado. I was nervous to begin, but it was a joke. More open than most maintained trails here in the northeast... like strolling through a park. It would be a -2 on your scale!
    --- The hiker formerly known as Rico

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •