Help finding up-to-date trail conditions

This site should help winter hikers find up-to-date trail conditions
http://TrailsNH.com

http://TrailsNH.com is a custom index of trail conditions for the last 30 days from:

• Rocks on Top
• Views From the Top
• New England Trail Conditions
• Hike-NH

It also contains NOAA/National Weather Service Snow Depth Map and USGS Topo Maps.

• USGS map servers can be real slow
• Snow Depth Map is just an estimate, but perhaps helpful

There is a simplified version for mobile phones http://trailsnh.com that lists just the last 7 days.

Tips:

• The map window expands
• You can drag on the map to move to a new location
• You can double-click to Zoom in (or use [+] and [-])
• When you move or zoom the map, the "Trail Conditions" list will change to match just the area "In View".

How It Work?
Every 4 hours or so my web crawler reads the new reports on VFTT, ROT, etc. Based on the title of the report it tags the report with latitude and longitude. I use the Lat & Lng of 54,000+ places (land features(summits, cliffs, etc), trails, water features(brooks, ponds, lakes), and shelters/huts in the Northeast, pulled from GeoNames.org.


Place Marks:

• If the trip was to one place, I try to put a dot on the map at that destination.
• If the trip is to several places (i.e. peaks), I try to put the dot between then.
• It does not always work out perfectly, but most are right on.

Place's not Marked:

• In some cases, like Bald Mountain there are too peaks (roughly the same height) to choose from. So the system creates a list of peaks we can choose from. You are welcome to help out and choose the correct peak from the list.
• In come cases the system has no idea. You are welcome to add the place mark.
• There is a moderator system for approving the new place marks.

I'd love to hear your feed back:
Is it useful?
What else does it need to help you plan a trip?

Thanks for checking it out.
- Kimball

Pretty cool. One annoyance is that when you click on a report, the pop-up text bubble causes the map to scroll, so all the other reports go out of scope until you scroll the map back to where you were.
Also, sites like VFTT distinguish between "conditions reports" which are brief, and "trip reports' which are more like storytelling. It didn't take me long to realize that the hike-nh sources I saw were all in the latter category. In addition to labelling the source, maybe make the link in a different color, or have visibility of the longer reports depend on a radio button selection? I don't think you link to trip reports on VFTT, but you could.

Looks really interesting and could be helpful. I just checked Owls Head, since it's "in the news" here. Your site did keep the bogus Romohiker Trail Conditions report, which has since been deleted from here. I don't know how you intend to screen/exclude potentially bad reports, or if you have or need Darren's permish to use this info.

deleted report located on your site said:

Owl's Head 1/6
VFTT: Jan 0644.144,-71.605
9 People broke it all out and used the Black Pond Bushwhack and the Bushwhack around the slide....
VFTT: Owl's Head 1/6
Feedback: [Wrong Location] | [Trash]

Click to expand...

Hopefully someone with start an Adirondack version so my made up trip reports can be more accessible.

Since you are not just linking to reports, but copying the data, it would be wise to contact Darren here at VFTT and ask his permission to use scrape content from his site. Posters here may also have issues with their content being used elsewhere.

Having said that, it's a cool idea and well implemented.

David Metsky said:

Since you are not just linking to reports, but copying the data, it would be wise to contact Darren here at VFTT and ask his permission to use scrape content from his site. Posters here may also have issues with their content being used elsewhere.

Click to expand...

I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that the original posters have the copyrights and their permission should be obtained before copying their reports.

Doug

"Fair use" depends on the amount of information copied (both absolutely and as a proportion of the original), and the purpose of the copying (e.g., news), among other things.
Consult your own lawyer, but you might be aware that lots of websites copy a paragraph or so of news items without paying for them. (Some big news organizations like the Associated Press would like to change that, but I doubt they'll be successful.)
Copyright will generally reside with the authors, not the website owners where the posts are first published. However, it's at least polite to check with those websites before scraping their content in an automated manner, to be sure you're not straining their resources, and because they might choose to block your bot.

Good show, Kimball. Give yourself several Attaboys.

David Metsky said:

Posters here may also have issues with their content being used elsewhere.

Click to expand...

i agree with metsky. good thing i don't hike anymore.

David Metsky said:

Since you are not just linking to reports, but copying the data, it would be wise to contact Darren here at VFTT and ask his permission to use scrape content from his site. Posters here may also have issues with their content being used elsewhere.

Having said that, it's a cool idea and well implemented.

Click to expand...

Copyright issues aside - is there really anyone out there who thinks they can retain control of their material once it's on the web? In these days of Google and other search engines? If so, then IMHO they're operating on a rather high level of naïveté.

Kevin Rooney said:

Copyright issues aside - is there really anyone out there who thinks they can retain control of their material once it's on the web? In these days of Google and other search engines? If so, then IMHO they're operating on a rather high level of naïveté.

Click to expand...

My kids do! Drives me nuts!

I do understand this and that's why I very careful about what I put on the web. I have no problem with the new site, as long as it's not covered with advertising!

Thanks for the comments.

Sounds like the down side is you think I am stealing your content. I don't want your content, just to know it is out there. I'm not copying the content and displaying it as my own. I display only 200 characters. I clearly identify the source 3 times for every post. And, there are 2 links back to the source for every post.

My intent is to create a geographic based index, that leads back to source. A usefully resource for hikers looking for current trail conditions.

Your content is already public in Google, Yahoo and Bing. I only show a sample preview as they do. This is what Google shows:


As for bad content. I expect to add some wiki like features, to allow the community to help keep the information accurate. Such as: 1) [Wrong Location] which will all you to move the place marker, and 2) [Trash] to all you to flag bogus/abusive content. Changes go to a moderator for approval.

The ADK posts have been growing over the last year. I display what I can fined. Same goes for Mass and VT. If you know of an active forum/resource please let me know.

Trip Report vs. Trail Conditions.
I do expect in the future to use different colored dots on the map to help identify the content. That may help here. They are all in the index, because a long report is better than no report.

Views, Rocks, NETC, Hike-NH are all open for search engines. There is a convention to turn away search bot (robots.txt) and none of these side turn them away. Example: http://vftt.org/robots.txt

Simply dissallow TrailsNH in your robots.txt file and I will drop your content from the index.

Rocks had disallowed search bots (via robots.txt) up till a few months ago. But that restriction is gone now.

I hope we can get past the content issue and find this site us a usefully resource for planning your next winter hike. I know I do.

-Kimball

PS. I am also a hiker:
Done NH 4000 8+ times
(except Passaconaway - least favorite, and Cabot - too far to drive)
Done the NE 4000's
Done the NEHH
Done the Presi Travers 8+ times
Done the Pemi Loop 10 times
15 to go in the ADK

Kimball - love your site - gives users one place to visit versus having to review numerous sites - good job!

Cool Beans

Nicely done, Kimball. This really has potential to be a very useful gateway.

Nice job Kim. Your tool will be of great benefit to a broad range of the hiking and skiing community at large.

This is an awesome idea...not just the aggregation of the reports, but mapping each one is kind of handy.

The other item I really like is the overlay of the approximate snow depth. Very good info to have when planning how far I want to go on a trip. The topo looks like it will be helpful for bushwhacking, but I haven't looked at it yet.

Nice job...and thanks.

I agree that this is an excellent new tool. While it's nice to have so many resources to check trail conditions, it's sometimes a pain having to check so many places. Thanks for pulling all of the information together for us in one place.

Great idea, well implimented!

Kimball, I don't believe Dave said you were stealing. He said you should discuss this with the site's owner, Darren.
I too believe the idea is interesting.

Glad you like it

Thanks Peakbagr. Excellent reminder, Its so easy to get off track. I'll talk to Darren.

Glad everyone finds the map based search helpful. Remember, you can zoom way in. As you do the list to posts shrinks to match the area in view. Oh, and you can expand the map by clicking that down arrow, just below the maps edge.

Next I'm thinking forest service road status would be helpful. You? Seems like every spring I find a gate closed, when I assumed it would be open.

Oh, Lost hikers, accidents, and rescues might be interesting on the map as well.

-K