Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 58

Thread: Mt Tecumseh Elevation Article

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Gorham NH
    Posts
    5,914

    Mt Tecumseh Elevation Article

    https://www.nhmagazine.com/a-4000-footer-controversy/

    A nice summary on the background for the decision to list Tecumseh under 4000 feet.

    Now we need the 4K committee to officially weigh in on the reduction in height as their list still includes it.

    I figure Isolation and Waumbek are next given AGW predictions on Mean Seal Level rise

  2. #2
    Senior Member CaptCaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    AHH....SKYLINE
    Posts
    527
    They should come up with a give or take 5 ft either side of 4k's that can be left in. Grandfathered so to speak. Tecumseh is an enjoyable hike unlike some of the other 4k's. Who cares if it's 5 ft shy. It's still a 4k. Do the math and see that's it's probably 99.9 % 4K. Hope they aren't so anal about these enjoyable just 4k's.
    Now some on the 52 WAV list should be taken out as they just plain stink.

  3. #3
    Senior Member skiguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Center Conway, NH
    Posts
    2,468
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptCaper View Post
    Now some on the 52 WAV list should be taken out as they just plain stink.
    It’s under review.
    "I'm getting up and going to work everyday and I am stoked. That does not suck!"__Shane McConkey

  4. #4
    Senior Member Tom Rankin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bloomville, New York Avatar: Dress for success!
    Posts
    6,578
    CaptCaper, your response is subjective. What if I dislike Tecumseh because it is near a ski center, and love Isolation because of its - Isolation

    The best approach is science and data.

    (Unfortunately the Catskill 3500 Club has chosen to side with your approach in NOT de-listing Rocky, which is now 3487, even though it was willing to add peaks in the past).
    Tom Rankin
    Volunteer Balsam Lake Mountain
    Past President Catskill 3500 Club
    CEO

  5. #5
    Senior Member TCD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    Tom, of course this is subjective, but I disagree. I think the reason a lot of folks pursue a particular list is tradition, not precision.

    So I like that the Adirondack 46 list stays the same. Who cares if surveyors 150 years ago could not be as precise as surveyors today? Or that Couchsacraga (on the list) is only 3820, or that McNaughton (not on the list) is 4000, or what the "prominence" of Yard Mountain is? The list is the list.

    Of course any area like the Catskills or the Whites or whatever are free to manage this any way they want, but they should remember it's all supposed to be just for fun!

  6. #6
    Moderator bikehikeskifish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    5,597
    Quote Originally Posted by skiguy View Post
    It’s under review.
    Which one(s) are candidates for departure? I'll leave them towards the end

    Tim
    Bike, Hike, Ski, Sleep. Eat, Fish, Repeat.

  7. #7
    Senior Member sierra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New hampshire
    Posts
    2,617
    Me and my dog are hitting the Big T tomorrow. He's working on the 3k's. Joking aside, I am ambivalent as to whether the peak should be removed or not. Its their list, their rules, they can decide what they see fit. I'm in a spot where list don't matter anyway, I just hike and Tecumseh happens to be one of my go to peaks. Its a nice hike and I love the valley. So many great short hikes you can wander on if you feel like doing more. P.S. I actually like CaptCaper's idea of the 5ft. either way rule to allow peaks to stay. I mean 5 ft. there are cairns taller then that.

  8. #8
    Senior Member skiguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Center Conway, NH
    Posts
    2,468
    Quote Originally Posted by bikehikeskifish View Post
    Which one(s) are candidates for departure? I'll leave them towards the end

    Tim
    Maybe Dingo will chime in on that. It was mentioned that the list would be changing on his 52 with a View FB Page.
    "I'm getting up and going to work everyday and I am stoked. That does not suck!"__Shane McConkey

  9. #9
    Moderator David Metsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Somerville, MA
    Posts
    4,965
    Quote Originally Posted by TCD View Post
    Tom, of course this is subjective, but I disagree. I think the reason a lot of folks pursue a particular list is tradition, not precision.
    But the history of the NH 4000'ers is precision, not tradition. Peaks have been removed and added in the past because of new surveys; there's no reason to change the practice now.
    You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself, any direction you choose. -- Dr. Seuss

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Lewiston, and Biddeford Maine
    Posts
    636
    If they take off Tecumseh, I hope they add Hight or Guyot to replace it. It wouldn't matter to me, since I've hiked them, too. Now that 52 with a view list has some summits that are overgrowing. Nothing a judicious cut or two with a hand saw wouldn't correct.

  11. #11
    Senior Member JustJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Ipswich, Ma.
    Posts
    483
    Quote Originally Posted by bikehikeskifish View Post
    Which one(s) are candidates for departure? I'll leave them towards the end

    Tim
    The OTHH'ers are just now starting to look into replacing some peaks. Nothing named for departure or addition yet as far as I know. Change my be a good year out. Ken MacGray probably knows more.
    Joe

  12. #12
    Senior Member nartreb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Waltham, Mass.
    Posts
    1,639
    So if Tecumseh drops off the NH4K list, will it get added to the 52WAV? Judging from photos, somebody has already been up Tecumseh with a saw, so the views are there...

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    MA & NH
    Posts
    223
    So is my old patch no good now? Eventually the list will be quite small at the rate we are going...

  14. #14
    Senior Member TJsName's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    'Springtime' on the Carters (Somerville, MA)
    Posts
    1,958
    How about we compromise and say it's only a 4k in winter?
    | 63.8% W48: 19/48
    Trail Adopter of the Guinea Pond Trail

  15. #15
    Senior Member ChrisB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    KoKo Head Direct About 1024 Steps one way
    Posts
    755
    Quote Originally Posted by TJsName View Post
    How about we compromise and say it's only a 4k in winter?
    No way!!

    I am 6 feet tall, so it should stay a 4000 footer for me (3995 + 6 = 4001). All you shorter-than-5-foot folks will need another summit for your award.
    Nobody told me there'd be days like these
    Strange days indeed -- most peculiar, mama
    .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •