I was actually thinking about adverse event analysis and how it compares to how plane accidents are handled. I guess in case of plane accidents there is a clear public interest in getting to the root cause and publishing the results as this can be used to make safety recommendations possibly resulting in many lives saved. In case of someone dying while hiking public interest is likely much more limited probably mostly focusing on the question of foul play, but once this is ruled out, I suspect that the agencies in charge will not commit significant resources (unless the case is high-profile for whatever reason) to investigate how exactly things unfolded.
What's been publicly disclosed so far in this case is not really much - some info on how she started her hike, a little bit on her equipment (although not much), and general description of where she was found along with some of her belongings. It's not clear to me if she had any gps-tracking enabled on her phone or a on separate gps device. A gps track would be very helpful in establishing a timeline and probably would take quite a bit of guesswork out of equation. Maybe there were some snow tracks that were identifiable?
At any rate, I suspect that even if F&G performs some deeper analysis, they are probably not likely to publish it. Perhaps this is to honor requests for privacy made by a victim family. Maybe someone closer to F&G can shed some light here.