Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Winter sleeping bag

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hudson, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    54

    Winter sleeping bag

    I am going to purchase a winter bag in the -25C to -30C range and was certain I would need to be duying down. However research is showing me that Polarguard Delta is now as light as down and a similar size. Comparing a North Face Tundra (Polarguard) and Solarflare (down) the specs on size temp and weight are virtually identical. Since synthetic is more wet tolerant and a lot cheaper - is down now a thing of the past?
    what???

  2. #2
    Senior Member Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Avatar-Keaton (4) & Dad enjoying the snow on Wachusett Greenway
    Posts
    1,673
    Jacko,
    I don't know the fill specifics of PGD Delta, it might be as light and/or as compressible, but I would be hardpressed to say that there is a synth anywhere that has the life of down which is a major benefit of down.

    Synths will lose loft over time and when that loft drops, the temp rating climbs -25C might be -5C in 3-4 years. Might be 0c in 4-5 years, but it also depends how you store it, wash it and care for it.

    If you are looking for a quality bag and do not want to be saying in 5 years:
    "I wish I spent the money on down", then buy down now. If you are just looking for bag and are not too concerned about fill rating longevity or if you do not think you will retain a flagging interest in winter camping in the years to come, then it might be better to go the the route of a synth bag. Good luck!!!
    Rick

  3. #3
    Member MissionsMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Spring Lake, MI
    Posts
    60

    Lightbulb Down VS Synth?

    This could easily degenerate into another down vs synth debate - it is usually pretty sad watching normally nice folks really dig in their heels and "tee off" on one another.

    To address you question, there are pluses and minuses with each choice. For me and imho, synth bags loose loft too soon meaning more frequent re-purchasing, (were?) are too heavy/bulky, and the whole "warm when wet" thing is pretty moot for cold-temp (winter) bags as i personally have rarely encountered enough liquid water to cause concern.

    To each his/her own.....

    fm
    "...silence is greater than the absence of noise"

  4. #4
    Senior Member DougPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bedford, MA; Avatar: eggs anyone?
    Posts
    10,679
    A recurring topic--a search should bring up some previous threads on this topic.

    Doug

  5. #5
    Senior Member Chip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Here and there Avatar: Ice Ice Baby...
    Posts
    4,729
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacko
    Since synthetic is more wet tolerant and a lot cheaper - is down now a thing of the past?
    No, but this is a good "pick up" as these are the first 2 bags I've ever seen that are actually rated, weigh and stuff the same. The only apparent difference is the fill and price. So if the ratings can be trusted, it comes down to the differences; Down lasts almost forever but does poorly when damp, synth does not last as long and does much better when wet. If you can stay dry you would buy 3 synth bags in the next 10 to 15 years and still have the original down.
    Dead Last > Did Not Finish > Did Not Start

    * ALL STANDARD DISCLAIMERS APPLY: IIRC. YRMV. IMHO. FWIW. HYOH. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE
    THAT INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS POST IS ACCURATE, RELIABLE OR APPROPRIATE FOR ANY PARTICULAR SITUATION.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Lawn Sale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Nobleboro, Maine Avatar: Even my shadow hikes!
    Posts
    900
    At those temps there shouldn't be any moisture to worry about.

    That being said, Mountain Gear is having a sale on the Mountain Hardwear 5th Dimension sleeping bag for $250. I thought about picking one up, and still may as I nest sleeping bags together for anything in the negative range. But, this has worked for me down to -40, it's just heavier than I'd like.
    Appearances are not everything, it just looks like they are.




  7. #7
    Senior Member DougPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bedford, MA; Avatar: eggs anyone?
    Posts
    10,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Lawn Sale
    At those temps there shouldn't be any moisture to worry about.
    External moisture is not the problem--moisture from your skin will condense and freeze in the bag. Not an issue for single nights, but over a period of several days or more, a down bag will lose loft. On a multi-day trip, one should air and dry one's bag whenever possible. A VBL will also help keep this moisture out of your bag.

    Doug

  8. #8
    Registered User Ridgewalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    427
    Hey Jacko!


    Here is a thread about the pros and cons of sleeping bag materials:

    http://www.vftt.org/forums/showthread.php?t=9135

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    741

    I too am skeptical

    that a synthetic could equal down on the basis of equal weight, size and temp wise. Who rates the bags, are they independently rated, or manufacturer rated?
    I have never found a bag worthy of the temp ratings, so I must be a cold sleeper.
    That being said, everyone has their own preferences, I own both types...
    Last edited by Bob; 11-13-2006 at 08:54 AM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Chip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Here and there Avatar: Ice Ice Baby...
    Posts
    4,729
    4 out of 5 reviewers here don't feel the rating is accurate, which is actually putting it nicely if you read the reviews.
    I tend to believe the negative reviews more here because they have nothing to gain, as opposed to the "5 Star" ratings that could be from a manufacturer or retailer.
    Dead Last > Did Not Finish > Did Not Start

    * ALL STANDARD DISCLAIMERS APPLY: IIRC. YRMV. IMHO. FWIW. HYOH. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE
    THAT INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS POST IS ACCURATE, RELIABLE OR APPROPRIATE FOR ANY PARTICULAR SITUATION.

  11. #11
    Senior Member sli74's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    H: Brighton, MA, Avatar :Brian and I at the 2005 Ski Gathering
    Posts
    1,815
    I started off buying only synthetic bags because I was afraid of wet down bags. Also, I solo-ed a lot and didn't want to be caught in the woods alone with a bag that wouldn't insulate. After buying 4 synthetic bags, 3 of which I LOVED, I gained enough experience to feel comfortable knowing that with proper attention and care during my trips, a wet bag wasn't the norm and so I ventured into the down bag arena . . . and now I won't buy synthetic again. Once you go down you never go back

    I find down more comfortable and warmer at the same "rating". I have never slept in a synthetic bag at the temp it is rated for and been comfortable however, I have pushed the limits of my down bags to 3 degrees below its rating and been very comfortable.

    Also, there is something psychologically warmer about down, it is just so puffy and cozy looking

    If I was suggesting a bag for a beginner, I might still tell them to go synthetic until they figure out if they love the sport enough to commit more money but for personal bags, I will always buy down.

    The above opinions are not based on a love/hate down/synthetic or on numbers and stats but on a completely personal and unhindered by data opinion by one user . . . me !!

    I recommend Western Mountaineering bags, expensive but oh so comfy.

    BTW, the original poster did phrase the question in a manner that would bring up the down vs. synthetic question so I don't think the re-hashing of that topic, however redundant would be off-topic for this thread ???

    sli74
    LIFE, I shall persevere! Everytime you knock me down, I will get up stronger.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hudson, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    54
    North Face Tundra and Solarflare specs are here http://www.thenorthface.com/opencms/...ory=73&site=CA
    Now I dont see why they would oversell the synthic tundra over their own much more expensive down equivilent.
    It appears to me that if longevity is the only reason to shell out the additional 450$. Thats a lot of cash to lay out for a bag that will only be used during one season. I would just have to look after it well in storage.
    what???

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hudson, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    54
    I have just read Chips reviews - and confess that they are terrible. Now I'll just have to sell the kids to buy a down bag. Oh well never mind I'll just do more research and not buy!
    what???

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Marina del Rey, CA
    Posts
    463

    Bag ratings

    Bob, here is how they rate bags sold in Europe-
    http://www.escape2.co.uk/advice/advice_en13537.htm

    It is my understanding from discussing bag ratings with the folks at MacPac, the NZ company, that all bags sold in the EU have to be tested and rated, so at least they can be compared among the EU rated bags.

    No idea how Americans rate their bags.

  15. #15
    Senior Member DougPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bedford, MA; Avatar: eggs anyone?
    Posts
    10,679
    Back in the '70s, EMS did their own loft measurments and ratings, which were at least consistent across manufacturers. Results were published in their catalogs. (1974 was a particularly good one...) Also included the insulation tables that I have posted in previous threads.

    You might take a look at the EMS Mountain-Light (or is it Mountain-Lite) series (down). Includes -40F and -20F models. They appear to be decent bags at a reasonable price.

    Doug

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •