Heavy guy needs snowshoes

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

sijesi

New member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Location
Lancaster, PA
I've winter camped, hiked in the Adirondack High Peaks on and off for years. Snowshoes are a necessity. Here's my problem: I'm 6' 3" and weigh about 210 -- without pack. I want to purchse an agressive set of snowshoes, but the specs for most of them say I'll be too heavy with my pack to use them. What I really want is a pair of Denali Ascents. My hiking buddies -- all much lighter than I -- wear them and they hop up those peaks like mountain goats. I'm tempted to buy a pair, with the floatation tails, and take my chances. But, really, am I just going to break these things? What other options do I have? I used to rent a huge pair of Tubbs, but they were garbage on steep pitches and ice. Any help would be appreciated.:confused:
 

DSettahr

Active member
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
980
Reaction score
141
I've winter camped, hiked in the Adirondack High Peaks on and off for years. Snowshoes are a necessity. Here's my problem: I'm 6' 3" and weigh about 210 -- without pack. I want to purchse an agressive set of snowshoes, but the specs for most of them say I'll be too heavy with my pack to use them. What I really want is a pair of Denali Ascents. My hiking buddies -- all much lighter than I -- wear them and they hop up those peaks like mountain goats. I'm tempted to buy a pair, with the floatation tails, and take my chances. But, really, am I just going to break these things? What other options do I have? I used to rent a huge pair of Tubbs, but they were garbage on steep pitches and ice. Any help would be appreciated.:confused:

I think the issue isn't so much whether or not you'll break them, but whether or not they'll provide enough flotation for you in deep powder. I'd think you'd be ok on packed trails and in powder that isn't too terribly deep.
 

sardog1

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
2,579
Reaction score
231
Location
If it ain't snowin' there, we ain't goin' there.
I'm 6' and 215, before winter pack. I've used Denali Ascents for the last several years. They're fabulous for their traction and ease of putting on and off. My 8" tails stay on continuously. You'll like them so much, and use them for so many years, that you'll forgive them their slight lack of flotation compared to the very longest snowshoes available. Just realize that they are easily the noisiest snowshoes on the planet.

You won't break them unless you bridge them across two sharp rock edges and jump up and down a bit, or . . . you carelessly load a sixty pound gear bag in your vehicle, and it falls on one of them exactly the wrong way in a sudden stop. :eek:

EDIT: If you weighed more than 250, my advice would be different.
 
Last edited:

WinterWarlock

Active member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
649
Reaction score
49
Location
Rochester, NY
I'm about 210, plus I usually carry about a 20 pound pack in winter - I've been using the MSR Lightning Ascent 25's with no problems. They're fine except in very deep powder, but I've still been off trail with about 2-3' of new stuff and been OK.
 

Tobit

Active member
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
228
Reaction score
25
Location
Manchester, NH
6' 3" 210 and you are calling yourself a heavy guy?? I envy you! :p That sounds like a pretty average weight to me. I'm 280+ before winter pack and 6' 2". For me, I'm going with a pair of Northern Lites Tundra. For you though, listen to sardog.. the Denalis will likely be great.
 

HikingBryan

New member
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
70
Reaction score
5
Location
Weston, CT
I'm 6'1 and between 210 and 225 depending on the season (too much turkey...). I use the MSR Denali evo ascents with great success. On anything packed out, they work wonderfully. Good grip, easy to put on and take off, and televators... In the deeper stuff I opt for the tails which for me don't throw off my balance or gait. I love them.

That said, in DEEP POW (where I would rather be on my skis anyway) they may give you a little difficulty with floatation. I'm thinking about buying another pair at some point to aid in the deep, but for a first all-around pair, you can't go wrong.

Just my $0.02

Bryan
 

WinterWarlock

Active member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
649
Reaction score
49
Location
Rochester, NY
If I may digress a bit, I'm pretty happy to see I'm not the only 6'1" 210 pounder out there! :p I'd still like to knock off a few, but at least not everyone is 5'8" and 140 lbs.
 

Little Rickie

New member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
124
Location
Rochester, New York
Denali Ascents! I love them!

I'm bigger than all of you but the longer shoes are too cumbersome on a mountain. If the snow is too deep or the mtn too steep I can't do that or go there. It hasn't been a problem yet but I have not been in real deep new powder either. Know your and your equipment's limits.

If your a big guy you may not be able to do everything a small lighter person can, so what. :)
 

sijesi

New member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Location
Lancaster, PA
Thanks, all

Just ordered my Denali Ascents and hope to put them to the test in the Bushnell Falls area of the High Peaks in early January. I'll let you know how they (I? we?) perform.

Thanks, everyone, for taking the time to steer me in the right direction.

Happy trails. :D
 

pks4000

New member
Joined
Jan 28, 2006
Messages
204
Reaction score
16
Location
Worcester,Mass.
Denalis will do it best

Buy the Denalis with the smaller (I think they are 6 inch) extension tails . You wont break them and they will get you everywhre you want to go.
If the snow is so deep they dont float you dont want to go since your party will be turning around after beaking part of the trail for others to climb the next day..thank you VFT!)

I still have the original Denalis (with the 2 spikes on either side of the binding) and they are still fine after 5-6 years and hundreds of winter miles.
AND there s a lot more to this shoe than meets the eye.

Ie: If you do your research prior to your hike you may not have to carry crampons on certain routes as Denalis are so agressive and reliable,, particularly superior on sidehill traverses .

Oh Im 6'6" and 245 lbs .

Be well and climb on!
 

DougPaul

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
10,714
Reaction score
363
Location
Bedford, MA; Avatar: eggs anyone?
Buy the Denalis with the smaller (I think they are 6 inch) extension tails.
The older (non-Evo) Denalis have a choice of 4 or 8 inch tails. The Denali Evos only take a 6 inch tail.

I'm happy with my Denali Evo Ascents. My bigger wooden flat Bearpaws haven't seen any snow since I got them.

Doug
 

Little Rickie

New member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
124
Location
Rochester, New York
Oh Im 6'6" and 245 lbs .

Where do you get your sleeping bags?

I just got a Slumberjack Ultimate 20 long at Gander Mt that I'll be trying this weekend. I find most sleeping bags too tight on my shoulder girth and the outside of my upper arms press against the bag and get cool.
 

The-Green-Man

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
Location
Nottingham, NH
I'm 6'3" and I weigh about 265. I use 36" Tubbs Mountaineers. I have the 2006 model and the bindings are flimsy... The newer ones have much better bindings.

When it comes to un-broken trails that are deeper than 3 feet it's rough going (lots of sinking). I am fine if I am second from the front. On broken trails I am fine.
 

Latest posts

Top