RoySwkr
New member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2003
- Messages
- 4,467
- Reaction score
- 285
http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/f?p=gnispq:3:::NO::P3_FID:2701999
Why didn't the Reagan supporters think of this?
Why didn't the Reagan supporters think of this?
http://listsofjohn.com/PeakStats/Climbers.php?Id=139241How much col or prominence does it have?
According to the guy who named it, the summit is off the trailIs that Huntington Ravine that that is above? I wonder if I went over it already.
Is that Huntington Ravine that that is above? I wonder if I went over it already.
LoJ says average of 59', correct as it has 3 contours, so "clean" ~ 40' and "optimistic" ~ 80'Clean Prominence: 9 ft/3 m
Optimistic Prominence: 28 ft/9 m
Line Parent: Ball Crag
Key Col: 5709 ft/1740 m
9 - 28 feet
Optimistic and clean prominence apply when determining values from a topo map, but don't we have real, measured values for these peaks?
Tradition.I can understand how Lincoln and South Hancock are listed, but what I don't get is why Guyot, with optimistic prominence at 240' and clean at 160', matching South H and close to Lincoln, is not. Can anyone shed any light on this?
Tradition.
Enter your email address to join: