Thunder Dan
New member
It is my understanding that in NY's Adirondacks that a 300-foot col is the minimum for a peak to be considered separate by 46er standards. Of course, of the 46, only 42 are truly 4,000-footers.
It is also my understanding that the minimum col in New Hampshire is only 200 feet for the AMC 4,000-footer club standards.
Now, what if you only counted the peaks with a minimum of 300-foot cols in your list of 4,000 footers. how many would New Hampshire actually have? What peaks would be disqualified by the 300-foot col rule?
Anybody have any lists like this out there?
It is also my understanding that the minimum col in New Hampshire is only 200 feet for the AMC 4,000-footer club standards.
Now, what if you only counted the peaks with a minimum of 300-foot cols in your list of 4,000 footers. how many would New Hampshire actually have? What peaks would be disqualified by the 300-foot col rule?
Anybody have any lists like this out there?